From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2008 - 10:58:45 ART
I did it like this and it works:
policy-map policy
class fa0/0
bandwidth 128
shape average 256000
class prec4
bandwidth 384
shape peak 512000
Does that satisfy the requirements?
Not sure why you are using nested policies...
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Ahsan Mohiuddin
<ahsan.mohiuddin@gmail.com>wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> I am confused what would be the solution to below requirements. Please
> help!
>
> Define two classes of service besides the default.
>
> Class Fa0/0 matches all the traffic coming from input interface fa0/0.
>
> Class IP-Prec matches all the traffic with an IP Precedence of 4.
>
> Class Fa0/0 is ensured a bandwidth of 128 Kbps and the output is shaped to
> 256 Kbps.
>
> Class IP-Prec is ensured a bandwidth of 384 Kbps. But if enough bandwidth
> is available, the class can obtain the throughput up to the peak of 512
> Kbps
>
>
> I tried the following configuration but when I apply it to interface, I get
> *"GTS : Can be enabled only at the first level"*
>
> Class Map match-all Fa0/0 (id 1)
> Match input-interface FastEthernet0/0
>
> Class Map match-all IP-Prec (id 2)
> Match ip precedence 4
>
> Policy Map Fa0/0
> Class Fa0/0
> Traffic Shaping
> Average Rate Traffic Shaping
> CIR 256000 (bps) Max. Buffers Limit 1000 (Packets)
> Policy Map IP-Prec
> Class IP-Prec
> Traffic Shaping
> Peak Rate Traffic Shaping
> CIR 512000 (bps) Max. Buffers Limit 1000 (Packets)
> Policy Map SHAPE
> Class Fa0/0
> Bandwidth 128 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
> service-policy Fa0/0
> Class IP-Prec
> Bandwidth 384 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
> service-policy IP-Prec
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART