RE: EXPERT plz plz help...OSPF scnario brusting my head..

From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Sun Aug 03 2008 - 07:24:46 ART


I not Brian (he's a jedi master, I'm a jedi apprentice)

But I'd bet I'm better at MS Exch 2003/2007!

There is a requirement in OSPF that traffic between any two non-zero area's
pass thru area 0 (the backbone). In your case I suspect another routing
protocol is running, or an interface is not in the area you think its in.

Please post configs so we can end this issue for you.

-Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of dave
dave
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 4:36 AM
To: Joseph Brunner; bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: EXPERT plz plz help...OSPF scnario brusting my head..

Hi Brian,

 What you told is seem to be my problem, can you please tell me how can i
tackel this & make it work the way i want it should be work.

Please tell me the OSPF route selection order in term of intra, inter, n1,
n2, e1& e2.

Regards,
Dave

On 8/3/08, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
>
> 5.) when i am traceroute from R6 to R1 for 200.x.x.x it is taking the path
> as follow:
>
> R6 --> R4 --> R2 --> R1-->200.x.x.x
>
>
>
> >On R6 show ip ospf database and please post the results and post "show ip
> ospf database summary 200.x.x.x 255.x.x.x"
>
> >And on R6 please post show ip route. Do you have anything else running?
> Eigrp? Bgp?
>
>
>
>
>
> i am expecting the path as below , thinking it is the best path to reach
> destination.
>
> R6 --> R4 --> R3 --> R1-->200.x.x.x
>
>
>
> >Yes Between R6 (in Area 2) and R1 (in Area 1) traffic must route through
> area 0, so it should go from R6, R4, <over area 0> R3, R1
>
>
>
> -Joe
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: dave dave [mailto:funccie@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 10:48 PM
> To: Cisco certification; bdennis@internetworkexpert.com;
> blog@internetworkexpert.com; Joseph Brunner; Narbik Kocharians
> Subject: EXPERT plz plz help...OSPF scnario brusting my head..
>
>
>
> Hi Expert,
>
>
>
> net: 200.0.0.0/24
>
> --------------------------
>
> | |
>
> R1 ---------------- R2
>
> | |
>
> R3=========R4 << === it means 2 physical L2 links ether channel as
e.g.
> L2 Po1 & Vlan 100 running on R3 as well as R4 to to form ospf neighborship
> over L2 port channel. Vlan 100 in area 0
>
> | |
>
> R5----------------R6
>
> | |
>
> -------------------------
>
> net: 100.0.0.0/24
>
>
>
> Note :
>
> this color represting the ospf area 2
>
> this color represting the ospf area 1
>
> this color represting the ospf area 0
>
>
>
> 1) R1, R2 & including links of R1 & R2 connected to R3 & R4 are on OSPF
> area
> 1
>
> 2) R5, R6 & including links of R5 & R6 connected to R3 & R4 are on OSPF
> area
> 2
>
> 3) All links are 100 Mbps.
>
> 4) L2 ether channel of each 100 Mbps links between the R3 & R4 is for vlan
> 100 ospf neighborship
>
> 5.) when i am traceroute from R6 to R1 for 200.x.x.x it is taking the path
> as follow:
>
> R6 --> R4 --> R2 --> R1-->200.x.x.x
>
> i am expecting the path as below , thinking it is the best path to reach
> destination.
>
> R6 --> R4 --> R3 --> R1-->200.x.x.x
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART