RE: RIP v2 routing table

From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2008 - 02:56:38 ART

Maybe this is why the Lab dates are so booked, eh?

LOL

Nice one Huan

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Huan
Pham
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 12:30 AM
To: Raghav Bhargava; Cisco certification
Subject: RE: RIP v2 routing table

Hi Raghav,

You do not even need to advertize the subnets in RIP to make them show
up as directly connected routes. Remove RIP from the equation . Make
sure you unshut the Fa0/0 and have a toaster connected to it ;-)

If you still have problems, maybe you can post it again in a CCNA board.

Cheers,

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Raghav Bhargava
Sent: Friday, 1 August 2008 1:20 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: RIP v2 routing table

Hi Expert,

My query is :-

I have a serial link and a ethernet link on my 2611 and when i advertise
both the networks thru RIPv2, as per the protocol they should show in
the routing table as directly connected by only the Serial link shows up
and not the Ethernet Link.

Please advise. 

--
Warm Regards
Raghav

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART