From: Tyson Scott (tscott@ipexpert.com)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2008 - 14:27:54 ART
The second is really more like a range. It will add any interface that
falls within that range. Just like "network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 1"
will add all the routers interfaces to area 1. There isn't necessary a best
way it is all preference. The only gotcha is on PPP interfaces when the
neighbor interface is put into the routing table with a /32. That can cause
multiple link state advertisements to be sent out an interface; beyond that
not much else to watch out for between the two.
Regards,
Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Cell: +1.248.504.7309
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: tscott@ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
yungli2008@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 1:17 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Network statement
Hi experts
What is the difference between these two network statements under routing
process?
network 10.10.10.10 0.0.0.0 area 0
Network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
After a search in Google and I understand the first statement says only the
particular interface will participate in routing process The second says
entire
network will participate in routing process.
My question is what is the advantage and disadvantage between these two
statement?
In real life scenario which one experts using?
Would you please anyone clarify my doubt? really I appreciate your input.
Advance thanks
Li
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:58 ART