From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL (paguanel@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jul 26 2008 - 04:24:25 ART
Hi
Don't put the "ntp peer" statement on both sides.
This will result in an "insane" status.
Configure only one one side.
Lab it up and check for yourself ...
Cheers
Pierre-Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "GAURAV MADAN" <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 1:06 PM
Subject: NTP peer
> Hi
>
> I want some clearifications for NTP peer command .
>
> If we want 2 routers to maintain consistent time between them .
>
> What will happen in following 2 scenarios :
>
>
> R1 (10.0.0.1) ---------(10.0.0.2 ) R2
>
> R1
> ntp peer 10.0.0.2
> !
> R2
> ntp peer 10.0.0.1
>
> what timing will they finally use ? (R1's or R2's) or .. willl they
> negotiate to some diff time ?
>
> 2) If I say :
>
> R1
> ntp master <stratum>
> ntp peer 10.0.0.2
> !
> and nothing on R2 .. will this cause R2 to derive timing info from R1 ?
>
> Thnx in advance
> Gaurav Madan.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:57 ART