From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Tue Jul 22 2008 - 15:39:02 ART
I don't mean to be mean when I respond like that guys... just you're losing
so much of why this is the greatest (most rewarding field, IMHO) to be in by
asking the easy to find out questions...
Micrsoft, and development, etc. there are literally hundreds of "right"
ways, but cisco its all so black and white.
So many students in my classes asked me what did I do get into cisco, the
100% answer was just go to "borders and read cisco books in the coffee"
shop.
That's it. No classes or college, etc. what other career is so simple to get
into and pays so well comparatively?
-Joe
XOXOX
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hoogen
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:31 PM
To: Christopher Copley
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: ASA Port forwarding
Lol.. I don't think Brian would ever use such a complex sentence to explain
something so simple... ;)
You got it right lol.. Seriously like Joe said do more research these are
basic questions... Cisco is so well documented..
-Hoogen
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Christopher Copley
<copley.chris@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I dont think that your understanding my question. My question was in
> respond to Brian saying the following...
> "It should be the higher security interface, the lower security
interface,
> the lower, then the high again."
>
> In the terms Higher security interface and lower security interface. In
> my mind if you have an outside (public facing interface) the security
level
> is 0. But that in my way of thinking is a Higher Security interface,
> because you need MORE security on that interface to keep people on the
> outsie comming in. And on the internal inside (LAN facing interface)
with
> the security level being 100 that you need less security b/c you are not
> worried about what goes out of it. Is that a correct way of thinking of
> Higher and lower security interface or not?
>
> Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:56 ART