From: Christopher Copley (copley.chris@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 22 2008 - 15:21:33 ART
I dont think that your understanding my question. My question was in
respond to Brian saying the following...
"It should be the higher security interface, the lower security interface,
the lower, then the high again."
In the terms Higher security interface and lower security interface. In my
mind if you have an outside (public facing interface) the security level is
0. But that in my way of thinking is a Higher Security interface, because
you need MORE security on that interface to keep people on the outsie
comming in. And on the internal inside (LAN facing interface) with the
security level being 100 that you need less security b/c you are not worried
about what goes out of it. Is that a correct way of thinking of Higher and
lower security interface or not?
Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:56 ART