From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Tue Jul 22 2008 - 14:59:49 ART
>In my thinking the more security in on 0 and lower security is on
>100. Is this correct thinking?
Well this is why companies purchase support contracts... ;)
In what universe is zero a better anything than 100?
To a security appliance looking for a trustable interface?
To an crude oil trader looking to write a futures contract for oil?
To a hooker looking to sell a hit of crack and handjob?
Please tell us you didn't just join group study to rip us all off with free
tech support?
Do you actually care about learning cisco?
If you can follow the complex gmail setup process you can go to this link
and learn to tread water...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_installation_guides_list.htm
l
(or was your resume fake, and I should call your boss?)
Doubt me?
-Joe
Former Identity Theft investigator, 1998
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Christopher Copley
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:44 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Fwd: ASA Port forwarding
Sorry to drag this out, but I have never used an ASA. When you day higher
security can you define that better? Does it mean the higher security is 0
or 100? In my thinking the more security in on 0 and lower security is on
100. Is this correct thinking?
Chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:56 ART