Re: rip passive int with neighbor command

From: B R (modularie@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2008 - 14:37:10 ART


Oh great.. now I'm confused. Could someone please tell me where I'm
right/wrong here?

-Ripv2 with neighbor statement & passive interface: Interface will still
receive multicast updates but will not send out updates as multicast. Router
WILL be able to form adjacency/neighbor relationship with the neighbor
specified in the neighbor command.

-EIGRP with ONLY neighbor statement: Eigrp multicasts to 224.0.0.10 are not
sent or received through the interface. Neighbor adjacency is still formed
with neighbor specified in neighbor command. NOTE: If you use passive
interface neighbor adjacency WILL NOT be formed.

-OSPF with neighbor statement & passive interface: Interface will still
receive multicast updates but will not send out updates as multicast. Router
WILL be able to form adjacency/neighbor relationship with the neighbor
specified in the neighbor command.

Thanks in advance for the help,

Mod

On 7/15/08, Igor Manassypov <imanassypov@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> got it, thanks guys!
>
> Peter Stephan <engpeter@gmail.com> wrote: Just to remember:
>
> In EIGRP:
> If you enable unicast updates on an interface, you DISABLE multicasting
> updates to 224.0.0.10 through that particular interface.
>
> In RIP v2:
> If you enable unicast updates on an interface (through neighbor cmd), you
> 'DO NOT STOP' multicasting updates.
> You use then passive-interface to stop multicasting updates if it was
> required.
>
>
> Don't confuse yourself... just remember in EIGRP you either have unicast or
> multicast, in RIP you can have both (unless you use passive-int).
>
> Cheers,
> Peter.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Nate
> Cielieska
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 8:24 PM
> To: Igor Manassypov
> Cc: Jonathan Greenwood II; GS CCIE-Lab
> Subject: Re: rip passive int with neighbor command
>
> Igor,
>
> When you turn on unicast updates with the "neighbor x.x.x.x" command, this
> does not disable the multicast updates out of that interface. It merely
> sends that particular neighbor a unicast update and sends out a
> 224.0.0.9multicast update as well.. to stop the multicast updates you used
> the passive-interface command. The passive-interface command has no bearing
> on your unicast updates so your updates will be seen on your router..
> meeting your requirements.
>
> Regards,
> Nate
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Igor Manassypov
> wrote:
>
> > if I configure that interface on which my neighbor sits as passive,
> > and I also configure a neighbor command explicitly, are routes going
> > to be exchanged?
> >
> > Jonathan Greenwood II wrote: Igor when you use the
> > neighbor command you are sending RIP updates via unicast by
> > specifiying the IP Address of the neighboring router as opposed to the
> > multicast address 224.0.0.9 which all rip enabled interfaces listen
> > on. Passive interface with RIP doesn't allow updates to be sent out
> > the interface but an interface can still receive updates from my
> understanding.
> > To actually form the neighbor relationship the interface should not be
> > configured for passive interface. You could also peform RIP
> > authentication on both sides depending on the requirements/restrictions
> of
> the question.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Igor Manassypov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Could someone please clarify rip's neighbor command mixed with a
> > > passive-interface? For example, if you are asked to make sure that
> > routing
> > > updates are only sent to a particular router, I will configure a
> > > corresponding 'neighbor' entry under my rip process, but to satisfy
> > > the requirement that only that particular router gets updates I
> > > would also
> > need
> > > to enable the passive interface. As soon as I do that, there are no
> > > more routing updates coming from that interface even though I have
> > > an explicit neighbor configured... If I do not use the passive
> > > interface, then other routers will get updates breaking the
> requirement...
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Igor M., M.Eng, P.Eng
> Network Architect
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:55 ART