Re: ipv6 tunnel interface encaps

From: Igor Manassypov (imanassypov@rogers.com)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2008 - 11:17:16 ART

• Next message: Jason Madsen: "Re: Serial Interface Bundling"
• Previous message: Mohammed Naviwala: "Re: ipv6 tunnel interface encaps"
• Maybe in reply to: Igor Manassypov: "ipv6 tunnel interface encaps"
• Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: ipv6 tunnel interface encaps"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

any extra functionality, may be?

Mohammed Naviwala <monavy@gmail.com> wrote: Hi
  
 basically gre has more overheads than ipv6ip tunnell so the ipv6 tunell is preferred....
  
 experts......more light on this please...

 
 On 7/15/08, Igor Manassypov <imanassypov@rogers.com> wrote: Guys,

Whats the principal difference between GRE and ipv6 tunnel encapsulations? On the surface both can do the same thing...
 

Thanks!

• Next message: Jason Madsen: "Re: Serial Interface Bundling"
• Previous message: Mohammed Naviwala: "Re: ipv6 tunnel interface encaps"
• Maybe in reply to: Igor Manassypov: "ipv6 tunnel interface encaps"
• Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: ipv6 tunnel interface encaps"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:55 ART