Re: ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx 10 vs. ip verify

From: Petr Lapukhov (petr@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Jul 14 2008 - 09:36:57 ART

• Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: UplinkFast and default port cost"
• Previous message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Undress which topic in the DOC CD configuration guide and"
• Maybe in reply to: ccie: "ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx 10 vs. ip verify"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,
"ip verify unicast reverse-path" is a legacy form of the command "ip verify
unicast source reachable-via".
They replaced it for clarity - to make the distinction between uRPF
"Strict" and "Loose" modes clear.

-- 
Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379 (R&S/Security/SP/Voice)
petr@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
Online Community: http://www.IEOC.com
CCIE Blog: http://blog.internetworkexpert.com
2008/7/14 ccie <ccie@just-horizon.com>:
> Hi GS,
>
> Is there any difference between these two
>
> ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx 10
>
> vs.
>
> ip verify unicast reverse-path 10
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Amin
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: UplinkFast and default port cost"
• Previous message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Undress which topic in the DOC CD configuration guide and"
• Maybe in reply to: ccie: "ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx 10 vs. ip verify"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:55 ART