From: Scott Morris (smorris@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:43:06 ART
I'm thinking that the "continue" feature is not actually operational in the
version of IOS that you have running there.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hobbs
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 3:38 PM
To: smorris@internetworkexpert.com
Cc: John; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Can't get route-map continue clause to work
John,
I tried switching like you suggested, that didn't work. Instead all routes
get metric 200 and nothing got prepended.
R6:
route-map TEST2 permit 10
set met 200
continue 20
route-map TEST2 permit 20
match ip add pre LOOPS
set as-path pre 65200
Here is R5's output, notice no prepends. I am using the same prefix-list as
I was before so I know it matches the routes:
R5#show ip bgp | b Ne
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 6.0.0.0/24 172.14.45.6 200 0 65000 i
*> 6.0.1.0/24 172.14.45.6 200 0 65000 i
*> 6.0.2.0/24 172.14.45.6 200 0 65000 i
*> 6.0.3.0/24 172.14.45.6 200 0 65000 i
Scott, I tried your suggestion and used "continue" instead of "continue
20"...but same results with or without the clause number.
There may be other ways to do it, but I am just trying to learn the logic
behind the continue clause. It seemed so straightforward, I wasn't even
gonna play with it, but as you can see, something ain't right :)
btw, I am running 12.4(12) ADV ENT IOS
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Scott Morris <
smorris@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> Which IOS version are you running? It may not be fully implemented yet.
>
> Have you tried using "continue" without a number at the end? (which
> will just go in numerical order)
>
> Have you tried simply putting two "set" commands under sequence 10 and
> thus avoiding the need for the continue command all together?
>
> That seems a fairly basic route-map in terms of the overall logic, so
> you shouldn't be out anything by setting metric in sequence 10 (other
> than missing the 'cool' factor!).
>
> Check out
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t2/feature/guide/gt_brmc
> s.html
> if you haven't already.
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> Senior CCIE Instructor
>
> smorris@internetworkexpert.com
>
>
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
> Online Community: http://www.IEOC.com
> CCIE Blog: http://blog.internetworkexpert.com
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
> Power corrupts.
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Hobbs
> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 1:10 PM
> To: John
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Can't get route-map continue clause to work
>
> John,
>
> Thanks for reply. The route-map is outbound on R6, setting the metric
> is just something I am doing to test continue clause.
>
> route-map TEST permit 10
> match ip address prefix-list LOOPS
> continue 20
> set as-path prepend 65200
> !
> route-map TEST permit 20
> set metric 200
>
> clause 10 is evaluated but the continue to clause 20 is not happening,
> evident by the show ip bgp command on R5 where the metric isn't
> showing up for the second 2 routes. It is showing up on the first two
> routes so I know setting the metric is applicable here.
>
> R5#show ip bgp | begin Net
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *> 6.0.0.0/24 172.14.45.6 200 0 65000 i
> *> 6.0.1.0/24 172.14.45.6 200 0 65000 i
> *> 6.0.2.0/24 172.14.45.6 0 0 65000 65200 i
> *> 6.0.3.0/24 172.14.45.6 0 0 65000 65200 i
>
> strange, huh?
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:54 ART