From: John (jgarrison1@austin.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2008 - 18:00:47 ART
First to do that I would have to make my trunk into dot1q-tunnel. That
would make one of my other two connections the root port. Those connections
are not trunks and would only allow vlan1. That makes for a lot of problems
if I don't do extra configuration ouitside the scope of the lab.
Right or wrong I'm looking at it as an error in the lab. I just can't see
making a loop being a good idea or something that needs to be taught,
besides I've seen enogh macflap errors
----- Original Message -----
From: "LJ" <lj@2u2.nu>
To: "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Can you make a root port a designated port?
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:00:22 -0600
> "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> : Well if I did that I would have a loop, and even if STP doesn't detect
> it that can't be good for a network....I
>
> If I got a task like that and I could make it work, and it works.. well..
> is it nice?.. no.. but if it works...
> I will try this on my pod.
>
> :think.....whats STP for again ;P
> : ----- Original Message ----- From: "LJ" <lj@2u2.nu>
> : To: "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>
> : Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> : Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:34 AM
> : Subject: Re: Can you make a root port a designated port?
> : : :>I meant this
> :>
> :> OK, what about this.. you make the trunk port asymmetrical.. dot1q
> tunnel
> :> :)
> :> then make it exit in the segment where it will be the designated port
> for
> :> it is the designated port tunneled through the root port on one end and
> :> out
> :> on the relevant segment on the other end... the downstream switches
> will
> :> have a tunneled designated port which is the tunneled designated port
> :> all the way to the root bridge.. it is worth a try ;)
> :>
> :> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:32:41 -0600
> :> "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> :> : Exactly!!!! I've moved on
> :> : ----- Original Message ----- From: "LJ" <lj@2u2.nu>
> :> : To: "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>
> :> : Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> :> : Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:14 AM
> :> : Subject: Re: Can you make a root port a designated port?
> :> : : :> OK, what about this.. you make the trunk port asymmetrical..
> dot1q
> :> tunnel
> :> :> :)
> :> :> than make it exit in the segment where it will be the designated
> port
> :> for
> :> :> it is
> :> :> the root port tunneled... ouch..
> :> :>
> :> :>
> :> :> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:09:42 -0600
> :> :> "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> :> :> : Exactly!!! the task is to make the trunk port f0/14 a designated
> :> port.
> :> :> The problem is that f0/14 is a root port.
> :> :> : There are 2 other ports connected to the root f0/13 and f0/15. If
> I
> :> :> change the cost all I'm doing is possibly
> :> :> :making another port the root port and putting f0/14 into altn
> blocking
> :> :> state. Even if I make f0/13 or f0/15 the root
> :> :> :port(I would have to make them trunks which was not asked for
> anywhere
> :> in
> :> :> the lab). I can't make f0/14 a designated
> :> :> :port, because that makes a loop and STP won't allow that. The SG is
> :> wrong
> :> :> wrong wrong, and I was trying to find out
> :> :> :if there is some "exotic" way to accomplish the task.
> :> :> : ----- Original Message ----- From: "LJ" <lj@2u2.nu>
> :> :> : To: "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>
> :> :> : Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> :> :> : Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 10:46 AM
> :> :> : Subject: Re: Can you make a root port a designated port?
> :> :> : : :>A designated port points the opposite direction than a root
> port.
> :> :> :> While a root port points towards the root a designated port
> points
> :> :> :> downstream away from the root.
> :> :> :>
> :> :> :> To make a port designated you have port cost and port priority.
> :> :> :>
> :> :> :> I can't fully follow you.. Can you paste the whole task here?
> :> :> :>
> :> :> :> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:23:12 -0600
> :> :> :> "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> :> :> :> : I have a switch with 3 connections to another switch that is
> the
> :> :> root.
> :> :> :> One of
> :> :> :> : the connections is a dot1q trunk. I'm tasked with making it a
> :> :> :> designated
> :> :> :> : port. I have tried a number of configurations and I've come to
> :> :> realize
> :> :> :> that I
> :> :> :> : cant make it designated because that would mean that one of the
> :> other
> :> :> :> ports
> :> :> :> : has to become root. If I could then make make the port
> designated
> :> I
> :> :> :> have a
> :> :> :> : loop.
> :> :> :> : : Ports going to the root can only have two states root
> forwarding
> :> or
> :> :> :> altn
> :> :> :> : blocking right?
> :> :> :> : : Can anyone see a way to accomplish this? besides making my
> :> switch
> :> :> the
> :> :> :> root?
> :> :> :> : : :
> :> :> :>
> :> _______________________________________________________________________
> :> :> :> : Subscription information may be found at:
> :> :> :> : http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> :> :> :> : : : :
> :> :> : : :
> :> :>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> :> :> : Subscription information may be found at:
> :> :> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> :> :> : : : :
> :> : : :
> :> _______________________________________________________________________
> :> : Subscription information may be found at:
> :> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> :> : : : :
> : : :
> _______________________________________________________________________
> : Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> : : : :
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:54 ART