From: Jason Madsen (madsen.jason@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2008 - 16:54:46 ART
Yep, a port security violation occurs when either the MAC limit is exceeded
OR when a secure address is seen in more than one interface.
Here's some Cisco doc' on it:
"* A security violation occurs when the maximum number of secure MAC
addresses are in the address table and a station whose MAC address is not in
the address table attempts to access the interface or when a station whose
MAC address is configured as a secure MAC address on another secure port
attempts to access the interface."*
Jason
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:47 PM, ccie <ccie@just-horizon.com> wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> Once I tried to configure the same mac address on two secure port it is
> considered a port security violation?? Even if the maximum limit didn't
> reached yet.
>
> And that is the case that cause port security violations triggered once a
> two ports with HSRP enabled on them? While it work perfect with the standby
> use-bai.
>
> Regards,
>
> Amin
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:54 ART