From: John (jgarrison1@austin.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jul 08 2008 - 23:28:06 ART
Couldn't you use SVI's?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marvin Greenlee" <mgreenlee@ipexpert.com>
To: "'Vineesh Viswanath Iyer'" <vineesh_viswanath@hotmail.com>; "'ccielab'"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: VLAN
> How simple (or complex) do you want to be?
>
> It can be as basic as a GRE tunnel configured between the endpoints with
> bridging from the tunnel to the Ethernet on both ends.
>
> You could also look at things like l2tpv3/vpls/vpws.
>
> Marvin Greenlee, CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec)
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: mgreenlee@ipexpert.com
>
> Progress or excuses, which one are you making?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Vineesh Viswanath Iyer
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 6:40 PM
> To: ccielab
> Subject: VLAN
>
> Hi Experts
>
> Is it possible to extend VLAN Across WAN ?
>
> A group of 10 machines in Site A and 10 Machines in Site B has to be in
> Same
> Vlan . If that is possible, what are the design consideration which we
> need
> to
> take .
>
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Vineesh
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:54 ART