From: Luan M Nguyen (luan@t3technology.com)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2008 - 00:46:31 ART
Your problem is this:
In R1, the loopback is in the FIB - connected interface.
It's also in the EIGRP topology and RIP database since both of these process
draw from the FIB.
On to the middle R3, both RIP and EIGRP advertise the loopback from R1 to
R3. Only loopback advertise from RIP get into R3 due to lower admin
distance 120 vs 170
THEN EIGRP RIP-OUT check the routing table - don't see the loopback route
from EIGRP, so it put that into inaccessible in EIGRP topology and won't
advertise this route out to R4, hence nothing there.
On the middle router, you could chose to leave RIP alone and R4 get that
route as RIP or change the AD of RIP to lower than EX and get the route as
EIGRP.
The question is: What will you see if you change the AD of RIP to 170?
-Luan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jack
Tsai
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 4:54 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RIP routing table EIGRP won't take it
R4# sh run
...
interface Loopback0
ip address 172.16.26.20 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
ip address 10.201.28.176 255.255.255.128
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.2
encapsulation dot1Q 2
ip address 10.14.26.20 255.255.0.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 10.4.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 10.4.20.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.30
encapsulation dot1Q 30
ip address 10.4.30.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.40
encapsulation dot1Q 40
ip address 10.4.40.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.50
encapsulation dot1Q 50
ip address 10.4.50.1 255.255.255.0
!
router eigrp 100
redistribute connected metric 1000 1 255 1 1500
network 10.0.0.0
no auto-summary
!
ip classless
...
R1#sh run
...
interface Loopback0
ip address 172.16.56.1 255.255.255.255
...
interface FastEthernet0/6
no switchport
ip address 10.14.35.60 255.255.0.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/7
no switchport
ip address 192.168.13.1 255.255.255.0
!
...
router eigrp 100
redistribute connected
default-metric 1000 1 255 1 1500
no auto-summary
network 10.0.0.0
network 192.168.12.0
network 192.168.13.0
!
router rip
version 2
redistribute connected metric 1
network 192.168.12.0
network 192.168.13.0
no auto-summary
!
...
R3# sh run
...
interface Loopback0
ip address 172.16.56.3 255.255.255.255
...
interface FastEthernet0/7
no switchport
ip address 192.168.23.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/8
no switchport
ip address 192.168.13.3 255.255.255.0
...
router eigrp 100
redistribute connected
default-metric 1000 1 255 1 1500
no auto-summary
network 10.0.0.0
network 192.168.13.0
network 192.168.23.0
!
router rip
version 2
redistribute connected metric 1
network 10.0.0.0
network 192.168.13.0
network 192.168.23.0
no auto-summary
...
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.13.1
R1# sh ip ro
...
Gateway of last resort is not set
C 192.168.12.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/8
C 192.168.13.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/7
172.16.0.0/32 is subnetted, 6 subnets
C 172.16.56.1 is directly connected, Loopback0
D 172.16.56.2 [90/156160] via 192.168.12.2, 6d11h, FastEthernet0/8
*R 172.16.56.3 [120/1] via 192.168.13.3, 00:00:29, FastEthernet0/7*
D 172.16.37.50 [90/158720] via 192.168.12.2, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/8
R 172.16.28.11 [120/2] via 192.168.13.3, 00:00:29, FastEthernet0/7
D EX 172.16.26.20 [170/2562816] via 10.14.26.20, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/6
D 192.168.26.0/24 [90/30720] via 192.168.12.2, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/8
D 192.168.56.0/24 [90/30976] via 192.168.13.3, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/7
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 11 subnets, 3 masks
C 10.14.0.0/16 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/6
...
R4# sh ip route
...
Gateway of last resort is not set
D 192.168.12.0/24 [90/30720] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
D 192.168.13.0/24 [90/30720] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
172.16.0.0/32 is subnetted, 4 subnets
*D EX 172.16.56.1 [170/156160] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
D 172.16.56.2 [90/158720] via 10.14.35.60, 6d11h, FastEthernet0/0.2*
D 172.16.37.50 [90/161280] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
C 172.16.26.20 is directly connected, Loopback0
D 192.168.26.0/24 [90/33280] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
D 192.168.56.0/24 [90/33536] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 11 subnets, 3 masks
C 10.4.10.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.10
C 10.14.0.0/16 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.2
D 10.5.10.0/24 [90/33536] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
C 10.4.30.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.30
D 10.5.30.0/24 [90/33536] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
C 10.4.20.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.20
D 10.5.20.0/24 [90/33536] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
C 10.4.40.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.40
D 10.35.0.0/16 [90/30976] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
C 10.4.50.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.50
C 10.201.28.128/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0.1
D 192.168.23.0/24 [90/33280] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h, FastEthernet0/0.2
*D EX 172.16.56.3 [170/158720] via 10.14.35.60, 6d12h,
FastEthernet0/0.2 is missing?
Jack
*Luan Nguyen wrote:
> very cool paper here that could help you:
> http://reports-archive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/anon/2008/CMU-CS-08-123.pdf
>
> -Luan
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Jack Tsai <jacknew2005@gmail.com
> <mailto:jacknew2005@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Jack Tsai wrote:
>
> topology: R3--R1--R4
>
> -- Background --
> R3 loopback0: 172.16.56.3/32 <http://172.16.56.3/32>
> All three routers are running EIGRP no auto-summary.
> R3 Lo0 is not introduced to the EIGRP by network; it is
> injected by Redistribute Connected
> sh ip route on R4 shows that 172.16.56.3/32
> <http://172.16.56.3/32> is EX with distance 170.
> All interfaces of the three routers are reachable by all routers.
>
> -- New add-in and observation --
> add router RIP version 2 on R3 and R1 with no auto-summary
> R3 Lo0 is not introduced to the RIP by network; it is injected
> by Redistribute Connected metric 1
> sh ip route on R1 shows R 172.16.56.3
> <http://172.16.56.3> [120/1] via 192.168.13.3
> <http://192.168.13.3>
> sh ip route on R4 DOES NOT show this route on its routing table!
> sh ip eigrp top on R4 DOES NOT show this route (172.16.56.3
> <http://172.16.56.3>) on its EIGRP topology table!!
>
> -- Remedy --
> add the command distance 180 172.16.56.3 <http://172.16.56.3>
> 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0> on R4 router RIP will solve the problem.
>
> --Question --
> (1) Is there a way we can do on R1 to change the distance of
> the learned route (172.16.56.3/32 <http://172.16.56.3/32>)?
> (2) Why 172.16.56.3/32 <http://172.16.56.3/32> is not on the
> R4 EIGRP topology table while it is on the R1 EIGRP table?
> (3) Any comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Jack Tsai
> CCIE R&S candidate
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART