Re: does the per ip any any (include all types of precedences)?

From: Rado Vasilev (decklandv@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jul 05 2008 - 10:12:49 ART

• Next message: Rado Vasilev: "Re: Confuison over ATOM L2VPN show mpls forwarding output"
• Previous message: josh lauer: "Re: Narbik Joins IPExpert....Interesting !!"
• Maybe in reply to: ccie: "does the per ip any any (include all types of precedences)?"
• Next in thread: Sean C: "RE: does the per ip any any (include all types of precedences)?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

no, if the idea is to match any IP packet, the last entry is sufficient.

Rado

> Hi experts,
>
> Is there any need for the first two lines?
>
>
>
> access-list 111 permit ip any any precedence routine
>
> access-list 111 permit ip any any precedence priority
>
> access-list 111 permit ip any any
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Amin
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Rado Vasilev: "Re: Confuison over ATOM L2VPN show mpls forwarding output"
• Previous message: josh lauer: "Re: Narbik Joins IPExpert....Interesting !!"
• Maybe in reply to: ccie: "does the per ip any any (include all types of precedences)?"
• Next in thread: Sean C: "RE: does the per ip any any (include all types of precedences)?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART