From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Thu Jul 03 2008 - 00:06:03 ART
Hmmmm... That makes life a little more entertaining.
What routing protocols are we talking about? Where is 'C' coming from and
where do you want to redistribute it? Where are you learning 'A' and 'B'
from?
The level of complexity certainly goes up, and I can think of a number of
impossible scenarios there, but was wondering if you have more details or
just a 'what if' kinda thing?
There's another option for using some AND logic. Take a look at 'ip
policy-list' and then within a route-map you can 'match policy-list' which
can also include an ACL/Prefix list in addition to the standard 'match ip
address' within the route-map.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor
smorris@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
-----Original Message-----
From: Morris, Jason L. [mailto:Jasmorris@checkngo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:48 PM
To: swm@emanon.com; GS CCIE-Lab
Subject: RE: using 'and' matching logic in a route-map
Ok, maybe I should be asking a broader question...
This route map is being tacked onto a 'redistribute' command
If I have a requirement to redistribute route 'C' only if route 'A' and
route 'B' are in my routing table... how would I accomplish that...
Jason Morris
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:38 PM
To: Morris, Jason L.; 'GS CCIE-Lab'
Subject: RE: using 'and' matching logic in a route-map
Because the router knows you should not introduce insanity into the mix.
Can the SAME ip packet really match BOTH acl's?
It's part of the great Cisco mantra of reducing ID-Ten-T errors on the
network.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor
smorris@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
-----Original Message-----
From: Morris, Jason L. [mailto:Jasmorris@checkngo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:16 PM
To: swm@emanon.com; GS CCIE-Lab
Subject: RE: using 'and' matching logic in a route-map
Ok, first question answered...
Second question is, why is it doing this
R8(config-route-map)#do sho run | s route-map route-map default-route permit
10 R8(config-route-map)#route-map default-route permit 10
R8(config-route-map)#match ip address 1 <-------- ENTERED ON 2 LINES
R8(config-route-map)#match ip address 2 <-------- R8(config-route-map)#do
sho run | s route-map route-map default-route permit 10 match ip address 1
2 <-------------------------- DISPLAYED ON 1 LINE R8(config-route-map)#
.... I'm confused.....
Jason Morris
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:06 PM
To: Morris, Jason L.; 'GS CCIE-Lab'
Subject: RE: using 'and' matching logic in a route-map
Correct. Same line = OR. Multiple lines = AND.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor
smorris@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Morris, Jason L.
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:02 PM
To: GS CCIE-Lab
Subject: using 'and' matching logic in a route-map
Match ip address 1
Match ip address 2
Vs
Match ip address 1 2
Example 1 should match ACL 1 '&' 2 and example 2 should match ACL 1 'or'
2 right?
Jason Morris
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Bentley
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 8:52 PM
To: Marko Milivojevic
Cc: GS CCIE-Lab
Subject: Re: SFP vs GBIC
And to know what kind of cable goes in which
LC Cable ends - go into SFPs
http://www.shcomwork.com/uploadpic/20068228521140041.jpg
SC Cable ends - go into GBICs
The cable ends can have one on one side and another on the other.
Doesn't
really matter.
Also, another word on SFPs - you have both the SX and LX flavors - with the
LX, of course, being able to span longer distances. You usually need
single-mode (color codes vary) for LX and multimode cable for SX (colors
vary), although depending on what distance you need to traverse you can get
away with swapping
SFPs can be either 1GB (show above) or 10GB. Rumors are that 100GB is
coming down the pipe Here is what a 10GB SFP (referred to as XFP) looks like
http://www.t3systemsinc.com/catalog/images/XFP-10G.gif
10GB "gbics" - also referred to as zenpaks look like this.
http://www.t3systemsinc.com/catalog/images/XENPAK-10GB.gif
As has been said before - these are either put into a small-footprint switch
(ie 3550, 3750, etc.,) or in big chassis - like 6500s through linecards that
can handle multiple of the same reciever (6704, 6724, etc., )
HTH
Matt Bentley
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom@markom.info>
wrote:
> Someone cynical might add that with the advent of SFP which has an
> identifiable eprom on it, it's much easier for vendors to enforce the
> use of "compatible" modules. Contrary to popular belief, Cisco is by
> far not the worst in this practice. Certain middle-eastern anagram for
> ice comes first... (~$1500 for STM-1/OC3 rebranded Agilent SFP !!!)
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 00:24, Tony Schaffran (GS)
> <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com> wrote:
> > They are both just media converters.
> >
> > The difference is mostly physical.
> >
> > The SFP comes in LC and the GBIC is SC
> >
> > And both come in copper RJ45 as well.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART
