question about .1q tunneling with layer 2 etherchannel

From: L. Jankok (lj@2u2.nu)
Date: Wed Jul 02 2008 - 17:07:03 ART


Hi,

I have three switches.

SW1 <-> SW2 <-> SW3

On SW1 I have a port-channel towards SW2 like this:

interface Port-channel10
  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
  switchport mode trunk
end

On SW3 I have a port-channel towards SW2 like this:

interface Port-channel10
  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
  switchport mode trunk
end

on SW2 I have for the ports to SW1 and SW3 this

interface FastEthernet0/13
  switchport access vlan 100
  switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
  l2protocol-tunnel cdp
  l2protocol-tunnel stp
  l2protocol-tunnel point-to-point pagp
  l2protocol-tunnel point-to-point lacp
  no cdp enable
end

This results on both SW3 and SW1 in this:

Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability Platform Port ID
Rack1SW1 Fas 0/16 151 S I WS-C3750G Gig
1/0/13
Rack1SW1 Fas 0/18 151 S I WS-C3750G Gig
1/0/15
Rack1SW1 Fas 0/17 140 S I WS-C3750G Gig
1/0/14

Number of channel-groups in use: 1
Number of aggregators: 1

Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
10 Po10(SU) PAgP Fa0/16(P) Fa0/17(P) Fa0/18(P)

Question:
Eventought the protocol of the etherchannel is PAgp if I disable
"l2protocol-tunnel point-to-point lacp"
on SW2 on the respective interfaces the etherchannel between SW1 and SW3
will go down.
The switches SW1 and SW3 will still see eacht other through cdp but the
etherchannel will be down.

Why is this happening?. It seems that LACP is needed eventhough PAgP is
used.

Regards,

LJ



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART