From: Luan Nguyen (luan.m.nguyen@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 02 2008 - 00:48:59 ART
what do you see with show ip eigrp topology?
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Matt Bentley <mattdbentley@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the very very quick replies. To my knowledge, it is installed
> in
> the RIP. BTW, route-maps not causing problem as I've tried w/o and gotten
> the same result. Thanks.
>
>
> Rack1R2#sh ip route 136.1.4.0
> Routing entry for 136.1.4.0/24
> * Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, *metric 27906, type inter area
> Redistributing via eigrp 100
> Advertised by eigrp 100 metric 10000 1000 100 1 1500 route-map OSPF->EIGRP
> Last update from 136.1.245.5 on Serial1/0, 00:12:30 ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 136.1.245.5, from 150.1.4.4, 00:12:30 ago, via Serial1/0
> Route metric is 27906, traffic share count is 1
>
> Rack1R2#conf t
> Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
> Rack1R2(config)#router eigrp 100
> Rack1R2(config-router)#disan
> Rack1R2(config-router)#dist
> Rack1R2(config-router)#distan
> Rack1R2(config-router)#*distance 50 0.0.0.0 255.255.25.255 10*
> Rack1R2(config-router)#exit
> Rack1R2(config)#*access-list 10 permit 136.1.4.0*
> Rack1R2(config)#end
> Rack1R2#clear ip route
> *Mar 1 01:32:11.487: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
> Rack1R2#clear ip route *
> Rack1R2#sh ip route 136.1.4.0
> Routing entry for 136.1.4.0/24
> * Known via "ospf 1", distance 110*, metric 27906, type inter area
> Redistributing via eigrp 100
> Advertised by eigrp 100 metric 10000 1000 100 1 1500 route-map OSPF->EIGRP
> Last update from 136.1.245.5 on Serial1/0, 00:00:04 ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 136.1.245.5, from 150.1.4.4, 00:00:04 ago, via Serial1/0
> Route metric is 27906, traffic share count is 1
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Dale Kling <dalek77@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > One thing comes to mind real quick when I think about this. Suppose you
> > redistribute that route from OSPF to EIGRP and that route went to some
> other
> > router in the EIGRP domain and got advertised back to the border router
> and
> > then you changed the AD of the EIGRP Ext. to 109 or lower. OSPF would
> then
> > lose ownership of the route in the route table and couldn't advertise it
> to
> > EIGRP anymore. Uh oh, we have issues now. This would be good for you to
> see
> > the "debug ip routing" of this effect.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Dale
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Matt Bentley <mattdbentley@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi GS:
> >>
> >> This is probably a ridiculously simply something I've forgotten.
> However,
> >> here goes.
> >>
> >> A router, running two IGPs (let's say OSPF and EIGRP). Mutual
> >> redistribution between the two IGPs. There is a route in the OSPF
> domain
> >> that I want the router to install in the routing table as EIGRP so the
> >> rest
> >> of its EIGRP neighbors can have connectivity to it. I had thought this
> >> would have taken care of it. Can you not redistribute one a router and
> >> then
> >> change administrative distance to have it installed as some other route?
> >> Thanks in advance. BTW, for those interested in a tabbed putty, this
> does
> >> nicely
> >>
> >> http://puttycm.free.fr/
> >>
> >> 136.1.4.0 is from OSPF domain, but I wanted it installed on the same
> >> router
> >> that is redistributing as an EIGRP route
> >>
> >> router ospf 1
> >> redistribute eigrp 100 subnets
> >>
> >>
> >> router eigrp 100
> >> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1 1 1 1 1
> >> distance 50 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 5
> >>
> >> access-list 5 permit 136.1.4.0
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART