From: Dale Kling (dalek77@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2008 - 22:28:49 ART
One thing comes to mind real quick when I think about this. Suppose you
redistribute that route from OSPF to EIGRP and that route went to some other
router in the EIGRP domain and got advertised back to the border router and
then you changed the AD of the EIGRP Ext. to 109 or lower. OSPF would then
lose ownership of the route in the route table and couldn't advertise it to
EIGRP anymore. Uh oh, we have issues now. This would be good for you to see
the "debug ip routing" of this effect.
regards,
Dale
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Matt Bentley <mattdbentley@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi GS:
>
> This is probably a ridiculously simply something I've forgotten. However,
> here goes.
>
> A router, running two IGPs (let's say OSPF and EIGRP). Mutual
> redistribution between the two IGPs. There is a route in the OSPF domain
> that I want the router to install in the routing table as EIGRP so the rest
> of its EIGRP neighbors can have connectivity to it. I had thought this
> would have taken care of it. Can you not redistribute one a router and
> then
> change administrative distance to have it installed as some other route?
> Thanks in advance. BTW, for those interested in a tabbed putty, this does
> nicely
>
> http://puttycm.free.fr/
>
> 136.1.4.0 is from OSPF domain, but I wanted it installed on the same
> router
> that is redistributing as an EIGRP route
>
> router ospf 1
> redistribute eigrp 100 subnets
>
>
> router eigrp 100
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1 1 1 1 1
> distance 50 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 5
>
> access-list 5 permit 136.1.4.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART