From: Marko Milivojevic (markom@markom.info)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2008 - 21:17:50 ART
General rule of thumb is:
For iBGP peers, use Loopback interface, unless otherwise instructed.
For eBGP peers, use connected interfaces (physical, SVI,
virtual-template), unless otherwise instructed.
If you ask proctor the question, you are more than likely going to
hear "what do you think?" as an answer :-). Why do you think those
answers I gave you are correct... or wrong?
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:07 AM, sham sunder <new_town04@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am sure this must had been asked before ...
>
> Most the IEWB'S labs we have here does not specify to what interfaces BGP peers to
> To the loopback addresses or to the physical address ...As most of te IGP's has connectivty to the loopbacks... IGP routing if not the issue ?
>
> What is the good practice ? Should we raise it to the proctor during test or is there way to judge it ..as i guess we normally go BGP if IGP;s are through..
>
> The solutions to most of the IEWB's lab shows it to the physical interfaces ...Unless if its not asked for load balancing .....? wht should be logic other then the IGP connectivity
>
> I am little insecure here ..as i don't want to dropped out for it ..
>
> Any help will be appreciated
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART