Re: is the ordering of calling the classes in the policy map is

From: Serge (serge.ciscostudy@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2008 - 07:39:00 ART

• Next message: Jared Scrivener: "RE: random-detect ecn !! what is the beneficiality of this"
• Previous message: raul raul: "RE: Damn, I finished the lab in 4 hours and had 4 hours to"
• Maybe in reply to: ccie: "is the ordering of calling the classes in the policy map is"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Yes, it is.

Evaluation against classes is made till the first match.
First match will define the policy to be applied.

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:30 PM, ccie <ccie@just-horizon.com> wrote:

> Hi Experts.
>
> Assume I have two class maps A and B
>
> And both have been referenced by a policy map X, and apply different QoS
> mechanize QoSA and QoSB.
>
> If I got a packet that match both classes A, and B,,, Which QoS mechanisms
> QoSA or QoSB would be applied to that packet.. i.e. is the ordering of
> calling the classes in the policy map is crucial??
>
> Regards,
>
> Amin
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Jared Scrivener: "RE: random-detect ecn !! what is the beneficiality of this"
• Previous message: raul raul: "RE: Damn, I finished the lab in 4 hours and had 4 hours to"
• Maybe in reply to: ccie: "is the ordering of calling the classes in the policy map is"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:52 ART