RE: minimum ospf network statements

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Jun 30 2008 - 16:39:53 ART


It may depend on when the lab you are working on was created. ;)

Older versions of IOS didn't have "ip ospf area (#)" as an interface
command. But yes, that absolutely would seem the best IMHO!

Otherwise, you may look at "network 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 area (#)" to bring ALL
interfaces in with a single command.

They may be specific about what interfaces SHOULD or SHOULD NOT actually be
advertised though. That means possibly be picky with binary.

You gotta read all the rules to get the whole picture there. When in doubt,
ask the proctor.

HTH,

Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor

smorris@internetworkexpert.com

 

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/

Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 3:14 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: minimum ospf network statements

I've been tasked with enabling ospf on certain links and am asked to do it
with the minimum amount of network statements.

My conclusion is that I don't need any network statements I can just enable
ospf on interfaces and use zero network statements.

Am I confused???



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:23 ART