From: Huan Pham (Huan.Pham@peopletelecom.com.au)
Date: Wed Jun 25 2008 - 23:21:56 ART
Brian,
It's a great idea on having different physical topologies and wording
for the mocklab. It's the primary reason I went and tried one from other
vendor (NMC), after trying few of yours. Scott Morris definitely can
throw in a different style of wording, and hopefully some sense of humor
to the mocklab itself :-))
Regards,
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brian Dennis
Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2008 12:06 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: IE & or NMC DOiT Labs to Concente on?
We're preparing to release version 5 of our products in the late July /
early August time frame and one of the changes will be regarding the
mock lab physical topology. The mock labs will use a different physical
topology than any of our other products. The idea is that before
someone actually attempts the real lab we want to make sure they haven't
become comfortable with our "standard" topology. Currently mock labs 1
through 4 use roughly the same "IE style" of wording which we've found
people getting too comfortable with. The higher number mock labs are
written in a different style which sometimes the wording itself throws
people off.
Each of the version 5 mock labs will use a different physical topology
and different style of wording for the tasks. This will ensure that no
one assumes "anything" when they get to the real lab ;-)
Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: +1-775-544-1653 (Outside the US and Canada)
>----- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: IE & or NMC DOiT Labs to Concente on?
Date: Wed, June 25, 2008 16:48
From: "Bill Eyer" <beyer@optonline.net>
> My first attempt I worked only with one vendor's topology. I did get
> to used to it. You may not mean to but you take shortcuts because you
> know the topology. Since them I have diversified and am confident
> that it has helped me get stronger. Any of the big companies doing
> workbooks will teach you the technologies you need, but a little
> diversity keeps you on your toes.
>
> Bill
>
> Larry wrote:
> > *Found this in my notes, it is the list of labs from IE vol II that
> > they recommend doing multiple times:*
> > **
> > **
> > * lab 1,7,8,9,10 & 11 *
> >
> >
> >
>
> > On 6/25/08, Thor Kopp <thorkopp@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have seen it mentioned in several places that a good technique in
> >> the final weeks before a lab attempt is to complete a number of
> >> labs over
and
> >> over again. Within the IE Vol2, can anyone recommend some good labs
> >> that cover a wide range of questions? I will definitely be
> >> including IE
Vol2 Lab
> >> 7 in the list, can anyone recommend 3 or 4 others?
> >>
> >> I am also thinking of investing in NMC labs to give myself the
> >> 'MOC' lab feel because I'm not familiar with their question
> >> technique or their topology. I am too accustomed to IE's topology
> >> and need to be looking at other physical topologies to make myself
> >> really take notice of devices connect to. Any recommendations in
NMCs DOiT Vol2 labs?
> >>
> >> - Thor
> >>
> >>
> >> ___________________________________________________________________
> >> ____ Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:23 ART