RE: Redistribution

From: Shaughn Smith (Shaughn.Smith@za.verizonbusiness.com)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2008 - 09:49:40 ART

• Next message: Tony Schaffran \(GS\): "RE: CCIE Security Lab Changes"
• Previous message: Morris, Jason L.: "RE: Reviews for Narbik's bootcamp"
• Maybe in reply to: 2008ccie@live.com: "Redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Could you supply more of your config, specifically for your OSPF/EIGRP
configs.

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
2008ccie@live.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 2:46 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Redistribution

Hi experts

I have one redistribution problem

R2--<FR>--R5--<FR>--R6
R2(10.0.0.2/24) and(10.0.0.5/24) R5 - running OSPF
R5(20.0.0.5/24) and(20.0.0.6/24) R6 - running EIGRP
in R5
lo0 and lo1 are in OSPF
lo2 and lo3 are in EIGRP

After mutual redistribution in R5, (EIGRP<>OSPF)

R2 don't have a route for R5's lo2, lo3 and 20.0.0.0 (eigrp running
interfaces)
R6 don't have a route for R5's lo1, lo2 and 10.0.0.0 (ospf running
interfaces)

Is this redistribution behavior? or ...

Can anyone explain....?

I really appreciate your input
 
Regards
Rahul

• Next message: Tony Schaffran \(GS\): "RE: CCIE Security Lab Changes"
• Previous message: Morris, Jason L.: "RE: Reviews for Narbik's bootcamp"
• Maybe in reply to: 2008ccie@live.com: "Redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:22 ART