From: Zahid Hassan (zhassan@gmx.net)
Date: Mon Jun 23 2008 - 16:33:50 ART
Hoogen,
I can't really agree with you on this less.
This is going to be a disgrace to many of us who
were very keenly looking forward to this new track.
Regards,
Zahid
CCIE #14103 (R&S/SP/SEC)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hoogen
Sent: 23 June 2008 18:11
To: Dane Newman
Cc: Neil Moore; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: CCDE
I can't believe that Cisco is doing this, doesn't make sense a computer
based test?? Did anyone take this during the networkers? I would preferred
it if I had to explain my final design to the proctor administering the
exam, even if it had been computer based. How would they grade the final
design now?
-Hoogen
On 6/23/08, Dane Newman <dane.newman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Take a look at this
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29094
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Neil Moore <neil@droopy.com> wrote:
>
> > I see a ton of stuff on the CCIE tracks.. but I only see one
> > Breakout session on the CCDE though... is this track not getting any
traction?
> >
> > Neil Moore CCIE5 #10044 (Current Complete Set)
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:22 ART