From: akyccie (akyccie@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 21 2008 - 05:24:12 ART
I think it should be "send on" to send the pause frame in case of congestion
either end whereas "receive on" will only receive the pause frame from
remote and stop sending the data traffice as it receive the pause frame.
Is this the correct understanding ????
----- Original Message -----
From: <2008ccie@live.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:47 PM
Subject: Flow-control
> How could I understand flow-control whether its receive on or send on?
>
> For example
> There is high volume windows 2003 server connected to Giga 0/1 of SW4.
> Configure so that can transmit high-capacity traffic in Giga 0/1 of SW4.
>
> Flow-control receive on
> or
> Flow-control send on
>
> I really appreciate your input
>
> Regards
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:22 ART