From: L. Jankok (lj@2u2.nu)
Date: Mon Jun 16 2008 - 09:49:02 ART
my guess is that the percentages doesn't say much because the weights are not
given. If for instance the weight on Bridging and switching and IP IGP Protocols
are way larger than the weight on for instance IP/IOS Features.. well. than you
are not close to 80 points.
It is kinda confusing but I think that you don't have to divide the percentages
you see on your score report to get 80%.. I think you need 80 points...
so you need to know the points value of each item.. and then you can
use your percentage to multiply with the weights see how close you really are..
my guess is that you are not close for Brdiging and Switching and IP IGP Protocol
are worh more points so the weight on them is larger... but.. I can be wrong on this..
I haven't done the lab yet and I haven't spoken with anyone who did..
this is purely based on reasoning..
Regards,
LJ
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:35:10 +0100
"Chris Gray" <chris.gray@ozonenetworks.net> wrote:
: Hi group,
:
: Do you think the following section scores are worth the investment of a re
: read fee? How close is this?
:
: Section Section Score
: 1. Bridging and Switching 59%
: 2. IP IGP Protocols 73%
: 3. IP/IOS Features 100%
: 4. QoS 63%
: 5. Multicast 100%
: 6. Security 63%
: 7. IP EGP Protocols 100%
:
: Thanks in advance
:
:
: _______________________________________________________________________
: Subscription information may be found at:
: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
:
:
:
:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:21 ART