From: Hoogen (hoogen82@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 14 2008 - 16:03:47 ART
Well, just try to recall something that you absolutely got it right in
Security or QOS section. I think that could give you 1 or a 2 point.
I think I would spend 250$ on a reread instead of the beer :) Just try to
recollect stuff from your QOS and Security sections.
-Hoogen
On 6/14/08, Chris Gray <chris.gray@ozonenetworks.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your advice. I will spend the $250 on beer instead then.
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Joseph Brunner
> Sent: 14 June 2008 18:04
> To: 'Chris Gray'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Worth a re read?
>
> not exactly being a wall street quant yet...
>
> 1. Bridging and Switching 59%
> 2. IP IGP Protocols 73%
>
> I can safely say this does not cut it. keeping swinging.
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Chris Gray
> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 11:35 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Worth a re read?
>
> Hi group,
>
> Do you think the following section scores are worth the investment of a re
> read fee? How close is this?
>
> Section Section Score
> 1. Bridging and Switching 59%
> 2. IP IGP Protocols 73%
> 3. IP/IOS Features 100%
> 4. QoS 63%
> 5. Multicast 100%
> 6. Security 63%
> 7. IP EGP Protocols 100%
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:21 ART