RE: CCIE on Trial at NetworkWorld

From: CCIE (ccie@texas.net)
Date: Fri Jun 13 2008 - 10:42:42 ART


Attacking Ethan Banks?? What the frick for? If
anything, Ethan is very methodical in his approaches to
network design and engineering. Not to mention, like
most of us, has a real life with real career
responsibilities and a family. One thing is for sure,
he is a very real and intelligent net-engineer. Those
Certguard guys don't have a clue about
anything..........

I was in a class with Ethan in California. He is the
real deal......... As far net-engineering goes, he is
more that real deal than I, when it comes to
experience.

Santi
ccie@texas.net

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Joseph
Brunner
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 1:10 AM
To: 'Isabella Figarella'
Cc: 'Gregory Gombas'; 'Sadiq Yakasai'; 'Andy'; 'Luan
Nguyen'; 'Brian Dennis'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: CCIE on Trial at NetworkWorld

what are they attacking him for? sure he was a little
slow on getting it (I
tracked his progress against mine :-)

 

I failed a few times, I think he passed on the first
try.. so that proves
slow and steady works. how could they attack him?

 

Certgard needs to get a life (and a graphic designer,
and web designer).
their home page lacks credibility.and aesthetic
quality.

 

 

 

  _____

From: Isabella Figarella [mailto:gigi.ccie@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 1:01 AM
To: Joseph Brunner
Cc: Gregory Gombas; Sadiq Yakasai; Andy; Luan Nguyen;
Brian Dennis; Cisco
certification
Subject: CCIE on Trial at NetworkWorld

 

The 2 guys at Certguard who claim to have "years of
experience" are
attacking Ethan Banks. I read their bull and visited
their site. They are
lamers who need to rattle chains to be heard. I guess
everyone needs their
15 minutes of fame.

 

They imply years of experience it looks like a year of
experience and barely
have any hits on their forum except their own.

 

So how to fix it? Attack Ethan Banks the top CCIE
Blogger. Anyone else
think this is just wrong?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:21 ART