From: Bill Eyer (beyer@optonline.net)
Date: Thu Jun 12 2008 - 21:00:20 ART
Just curious, but does you customer have their own address space or are
the renting addresses from the providers?
Bill
reto_ccie wrote:
> I appreciate all your suggestions, have a good day guys!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu 12 Jun 2008 06:47:18 PM EDT
> From: Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
> [ Add to Address Book | Block Address | Report as Spam ]
> To: <reto_ccie@myway.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: RE: Best Router for Multihoming BGP for small customer
>
>
> load balancing? hmmm..
>
> yup... you'll be load balancing using the default route to different
> destinations...
>
> don't play around with ip ranges just run the normal per destination load
> balancing... could one guy with a porno download kill one provider? you bet,
> but then you should be using qos to prevent this kind of stuff.
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: reto_ccie [mailto:reto_ccie@myway.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 5:48 PM
> To: joe@affirmedsystems.com; reto_ccie@myway.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Best Router for Multihoming BGP for small customer
>
>
> Thank you JOe by the Kind response,
>
> in that case appear that I can use the 1841,
>
> Just, I was wondering if I receive a default routes from both different ISP,
> then I will have appropiate load balancing? how?
>
> I know that if you recieve both default routes the router by default will
> use per destination load balancing, or I need to go to a balance base in
> range of networks (one range for ISP 1 (0.0.0.0 to 126.255.255.255) an
> range for ISP 2 (128.0.0.0.0 223.255.255.255).
>
> Thank again
>
> Victor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu 12 Jun 2008 05:26:50 PM EDT
>
> From: Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
>
> [ Add to Address Book | Block Address | Report as Spam ]
>
> To: 'reto_ccie' <reto_ccie@myway.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>
> Subject: RE: Best Router for Multihoming BGP for small customer
>
>
> you don't need to "handle" bgp more than the session... just accept default
> routes from your providers in this scenario... an 1841 should work fine - IF
> you only need limited interfaces... if you want more flexibility I would
> recommend the 2811 with a 4 port fastherwic.
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Ofreto_ccie
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 5:17 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Best Router for Multihoming BGP for small customer
>
> Hi Group,
> I have to decide about a router for multihoming with two different ISP using BGP.
>
> Currently we have the possibility to use a router 1841 for that, but I waslooking for a documentation in order to ensure that router have enough performance to handle BGP in that way.
>
> Somebody know info about that or where I can find it, I will appreciate.
>
> Thank You in advance by your help Group
>
> Victor
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
> Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:21 ART