From: reto_ccie (reto_ccie@myway.com)
Date: Thu Jun 12 2008 - 18:47:54 ART
Thank you JOe by the Kind response,
in that case appear that I can use the 1841,
Just, I was wondering if I receive a default routes from both different ISP, then I will have appropiate load balancing? how?
I know that if you recieve both default routes the router by default will use per destination load balancing, or I need to go to a balance base in range of networks (one range for ISP 1 (0.0.0.0 to 126.255.255.255) an range for ISP 2 (128.0.0.0.0 223.255.255.255).
Thank again
Victor
-----Original Message-----
Date: Thu 12 Jun 2008 05:26:50 PM EDT
From: Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
[ Add to Address Book | Block Address | Report as Spam ]
To: 'reto_ccie' <reto_ccie@myway.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: Best Router for Multihoming BGP for small customer
you don't need to "handle" bgp more than the session... just accept default
routes from your providers in this scenario... an 1841 should work fine - IF
you only need limited interfaces... if you want more flexibility I would
recommend the 2811 with a 4 port fastherwic.
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
reto_ccie
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 5:17 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Best Router for Multihoming BGP for small customer
Hi Group,
I have to decide about a router for multihoming with two different ISP using
BGP.
Currently we have the possibility to use a router 1841 for that, but I was
looking for a documentation in order to ensure that router have enough
performance to handle BGP in that way.
Somebody know info about that or where I can find it, I will appreciate.
Thank You in advance by your help Group
Victor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:21 ART