PVDM-256K-16 Vs PVDM-256K-112

From: Cisco Godfather (cisco_godfather@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jun 10 2008 - 21:29:56 ART

• Next message: Mohamed Tandou: "Re: NDA Violation ! [7:131429]"
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "Re: Lab do and dont's..VTY access"
• Next in thread: Radioactive Frog: "Re: PVDM-256K-16 Vs PVDM-256K-112"
• Maybe reply: Radioactive Frog: "Re: PVDM-256K-16 Vs PVDM-256K-112"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello folks
 
 
i do have 1760 router, and currently it has PVDM-12 which is sucks i know :)
 
will be better if i installed One PVDM-256K-16 or TWO PVDM-256K-12 ???
 
As i understand it correct, the PVDM-256K-16 provide me with 4 DSP resources, while the PVDM-256K-12 provide me with 3 each, so is it correct if i think about it as: 4 DSPs Vs 6 DSPs?? am talking about 1760 router in a lab environment not in production :)
 
Will be better to install One PVDM-256K-16 or TWO PVDM-256K-12 on this 1760??
 
The price is the reason behind my question :)
 
2XPVDM-256K-162 = $200
1XPVDM-256K-16 = $300
 
Thanks in advance for you help
 

• Next message: Mohamed Tandou: "Re: NDA Violation ! [7:131429]"
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "Re: Lab do and dont's..VTY access"
• Next in thread: Radioactive Frog: "Re: PVDM-256K-16 Vs PVDM-256K-112"
• Maybe reply: Radioactive Frog: "Re: PVDM-256K-16 Vs PVDM-256K-112"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:21 ART