From: Roger RPF (rpf@bluemail.ch)
Date: Sun Jun 08 2008 - 15:16:48 ART
Yes, you are right, I understand it now. It works in my setup as well after
Ive done a reboot, somehow the router was messed up after playing the whole
time with it. Troubleshooting rule # 1 helped: Reboot is always good :o)
But it was a good lesson to understand the redistribute connected and the
local networks.
regards
Roger
Von: CCIE3000 [mailto:ccie3000@googlemail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 8. Juni 2008 17:55
An: Roger RPF
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Betreff: Re: redistribute connected
Strange this, I set up a lab as you've described and it worked fine no
problems.
On 6/5/08, Roger RPF <rpf@bluemail.ch> wrote:
Hi group,
I have a question regarding redistribute connected. Following scenario:
---<R1 OSPF>----<R2 OSPF and EIGRP>----<R3 EIGRP>----
The links connecting the routers are configured as network statement in the
related protocol.
On R2, if I redistribute EIGRP into OSPF, I do not see the R2-R3 link (EIGRP
directly connected) in the R1 routing table. On R2 I additionally have to
configure redistribute connected under the OSPF process.
If I do the other way: On R2, redistribute OSPF into EIGRP, I can see the
network R1-R2 (OSPF directly connected) in the routing table of R3.
My question, is this default behaviour of OSPF? I need to use the
redistribute connected in order to get the directly connected network of the
other protocol (in this case EIGRP) into OSPF, even if I have configured
this particular network in EIGRP?
Would be very thankful for clarification
Roger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:21 ART