From: brett spunt (bspunt_2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Jun 07 2008 - 13:48:00 ART
I'd change the CCIE policy to the following to enable WRED:
policy-map CCIE
class PRE3
bandwidth 128
random-detect prec-based
It looks like that's what they are looking for..
___________________________________
Brett Michael Spunt, CCIE No. 12745
Senior Consultant
Convergence Practice, AT&T Consulting
http://www.att.com/consulting
Bs3757@att.com
Your world. Delivered.
--- On Sat, 6/7/08, 2008ccie@live.com <2008ccie@live.com> wrote:
> From: 2008ccie@live.com <2008ccie@live.com>
> Subject: Precedence QoS
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Date: Saturday, June 7, 2008, 7:24 AM
> sorry for the mistake
>
> Hi experts
>
> here is my scenario
>
> e0 e0 e0
> R1--<FR>--R2---<FR>-- R3
>
> R1-e0-vlan1-100.100.100.0
> R2-e0-vlan2-105.105.105.0
> R3-e0-vlan3-110.110.110.0
>
> The question is
>
> All traffic from e0 of R2 (vlan2) with IP Precedence 3 and
> traffic from vlan1
> (R1 e0) destined to VLAN3 (R3 e0) has a guaranteed minimum
> bandwidth of 128K.
> in case of congestion, that these packets get dropped
> randomly.
> Limit all traffic from e0 of R2 with IP Precedence 2 to
> 128K.
> Do NOT use policing or rate-limiting. Do not use an ACL to
> match on IP
> Precedence
>
> in R2
> !
> access-list 101 permit ip 100.100.100.0 0.0.0.255
> 110.110.110.0 0.0.0.255
> !
> class-map PRE3
> match input-interface e0
> match precedence 3
> match access-group 101
> !
> class-map PRE2
> match input-interface e0
> match precedence 2
> !
> policy-map CCIE
> class PRE3
> bandwidth 128
> class PRE2
> shape average 128000
> !
> interface serial0
> service-policy output CCIE
> !
> Can anyone correct me?
>
> Regards
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:21 ART