From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 07 2008 - 05:46:17 ART
Yes, that's the best you can do with PIX.
If you remove PIX, you can use Cisco Peformance Routing to do
fanciful load balancing across 2 ISPs without running BGP.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:30 PM, A.G. Ananth Sarma (GMail)
<ananth.sarma@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi WB,
>
> Though the link was a useful reading, it cannot be used to configure load
> balancing.
>
> See below the write up found in that site:
>
> "The configuration described in this document can not be used for load
> balancing or load sharing. Use this configuration for redundancy or backup
> purposes only. Outgoing traffic uses the primary ISP and then the secondary
> ISP, if the primary fails. Failure of the primary ISP causes a temporary
> disruption of traffic."
>
> Regards,
>
> Ananth
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:16 AM, WorkerBee <ciscobee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Probably you may want to use PIX 7.2 new ISP dual link (Active/Standby)
>> feature.
>>
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00806e880b.shtml
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:11 PM, jenifer Dcosta <jeniferdcosta@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Experts,
>> >
>> > I have 2 perimeter internet routers with 2 ISP and behind that a
>> > firewall i
>> > want to load balance between
>> >
>> > two routers i dont want to use BGP and also there is no way to put 2
>> > default routes on cisco pix (not allowed),
>> >
>> > I dont want to use any third party hardware to load balance in between
>> > pix
>> > and perimeter routers,
>> >
>> > Can any body help me with this solution.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > jenifer.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:21 ART