From: Chris Gray (chris.gray@ozonenetworks.net)
Date: Thu Jun 05 2008 - 04:40:41 ART
Hi Roger,
I saw this behaviour also when redistributing Rip into OSPF, It didn't carry
the Rip connected route.
I fixed this be specifying a metric when redistributing. E.g
Router ospf 10
Redistribute rip subnets metric 200
Regards
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Roger RPF
Sent: 05 June 2008 07:53
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: redistribute connected
Hi group,
I have a question regarding redistribute connected. Following scenario:
---<R1 OSPF>----<R2 OSPF and EIGRP>----<R3 EIGRP>----
The links connecting the routers are configured as network statement in the
related protocol.
On R2, if I redistribute EIGRP into OSPF, I do not see the R2-R3 link (EIGRP
directly connected) in the R1 routing table. On R2 I additionally have to
configure redistribute connected under the OSPF process.
If I do the other way: On R2, redistribute OSPF into EIGRP, I can see the
network R1-R2 (OSPF directly connected) in the routing table of R3.
My question, is this default behaviour of OSPF? I need to use the
redistribute connected in order to get the directly connected network of the
other protocol (in this case EIGRP) into OSPF, even if I have configured
this particular network in EIGRP?
Would be very thankful for clarification
Roger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:20 ART