From: Mike Haddad (mike.haddad@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jun 03 2008 - 17:13:03 ART
Hello,
That makes lots of sense and what is the solution in this type of situation?
Is it to use a aribitrary MAC Address for HSRP?
Thanks,
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:54:43 +0300From: itsfortarget@gmail.comTo:
mike.haddad@hotmail.comSubject: Re: HSRP and BIACC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
HELLO,
When port security is configured on the switch ports that are connected to the
HSRP enabled routers, it causes a MAC violation, since you cannot have the
same secure MAC address on more than one interface. A security violation
occurs on a secure port in one of these situations:
The maximum number of secure MAC addresses is added to the address table, and
a station whose MAC address is not in the address table attempts to access the
interface.
An address that is learned or configured on one secure interface is seen on
another secure interface in the same VLAN.
By default, a port security violation causes the switch interface to become
error-disabled and to shutdown immediately, which blocks the HSRP status
messages between the
routers.http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note091
86a0080094afd.shtml#topic5
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Mike Haddad <mike.haddad@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello, When the question says do not use the BIA address for HSRP. Isn't it
thedefault behavior of HSRP?Thanks in
advance,Regards,_____________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:20 ART