From: Jack Tsai (tsai@eng.fsu.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 03 2008 - 09:58:39 ART
Cisco certification wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You have tried to post to a GroupStudy.com certification mailing list. Because
> the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required
> to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
> spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending
> Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE).
>
> PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL
> YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED.
>
>
> By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following:
>
> 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
>
> 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
>
> 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com
>
> 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
>
> 5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
>
> 6. The message is NOT a test message.
>
> To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once
> confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.
>
>
> Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
>
>
> First time posters to GroupStudy.com are required to agree to the GroupStudy terms and conditions.
> Replying to this email, certifies you have read and agree to the GroupStudy posting guidelines and terms and conditions.
>
> --- Original Message Follows ---
>
> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 08:35:19 -0400
> From: Jack Tsai <tsai@eng.fsu.edu>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: CCIE LAb permission
>
> test.
>
> Recently I sent a message as follows to ccielab@groupstudy.com, but
> never got posted.
>
> Dear Study Group:
>
> We have two LVS servers running linux that we want them to do fail-over.
> One server, 172.16.28.37, has one NIC, and 172.16.28.44 has been
> assigned to the same NIC as the secondary IP address.
> 172.16.28.44 is the server address of the LVS service.
> The other server, 172.16.28.20, has two NIC's, and 172.16.28.44 would be
> assigned to the second NIC when the first LVS server dies.
> Both servers have the same default gateway, 172.16.28.1, which is the
> server switch, Cisco 4503.
> The server switch's default gateway is 172.16.28.2, a cisco 6509. IP
> routing is enabled on both 4503 and 6509 switches.
>
> When we disable the second IP setup on the first server and enable the
> second NIC on the second server, the following are observed:
> (1) show arp | include 28.44 on the server switch (4503) still shows the
> MAC address of the first server's NIC.
> (2) ping 172.16.28.44 is not successful within the subnet or outside the
> subnet.
> (3) after clear arp-cache on the server siwtch, ping 172.16.28.44 within
> the subnet is successful, but cannot ping it from outside.
> (4) show arp | include 28.44 on the 6509 switch shows the MAC address of
> the first server NIC, before and after the clear arp-cache on the server
> switch (4503).
>
> After swapping 172.16.28.44 back from the second sever to the first
> server, the following are observed:
> (5) ping 172.16.28.44 is successful from everywhere.
> (6) show arp | include 28.44 on the server switch (4503) still shows the
> MAC address of the SECOND server's NIC.
> (7) had to clear arp-cache on the server siwtch (4503) three times
> before show arp | include 28.44 could show the FIRST server's NIC.
>
> Could someone shed a light on the dark area between (5) and (6)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jack Tsai
> study very hard for the CCIE R&S lab
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 01 2008 - 06:23:20 ART