Shape Peak

From: ahmed badr (eng.ahmedbadr@gmail.com)
Date: Sat May 31 2008 - 10:17:53 ART

• Next message: Dennis Worth: "Re: IPV6 Tunnelling"
• Previous message: CCIE3000: "IPV6 Tunnelling"
• Next in thread: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: Mark Stephanus Chandra: "RE: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: ahmed badr: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: Narbik Kocharians: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: ahmed badr: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Experts,

What's the difference between shaping with average of 256k with be=0 and
shaping with peak 128k (with be=bc) and get the same rate of 256k ?
aren't they the same?

• Next message: Dennis Worth: "Re: IPV6 Tunnelling"
• Previous message: CCIE3000: "IPV6 Tunnelling"
• Next in thread: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: Mark Stephanus Chandra: "RE: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: ahmed badr: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: Narbik Kocharians: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: ahmed badr: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Maybe reply: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: Shape Peak"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:19 ART