From: John (jgarrison1@austin.rr.com)
Date: Fri May 30 2008 - 23:49:59 ART
Shouldn't it be switchport trunk nonnegotiate for the last command disabling
DTP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Z Linux" <z.linux@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 2:18 AM
Subject: ISL Trunks
> Hi 2 All,
>
> I have the following question in sequence ..... I have mentioned the
> answer as
> well ; but it doesnt work??
>
> If I enable Trunk on ports fa 0/23 -24 then Question(2) goes wrong?????
> <Q1>Configure an ISL trunk between Sw1 and SW2 on port fa 0/23 -24
>
> <Q2>configure such that you block VTP and DTP broadcast traffic on all
> fastethernet of SW1 and SW2
>
> <A1>SW1& SW2 ( ports fa 0/23 -24 )switchport trunk encapsulation
> ISLswitchport
> mode trunk
> <A2>SW1 & SW2vtp mode transparent ( # disabling VTP Traffic )int ran fa
> 0/1
> -24switchport mode accessswitchport nonegotiate ( disable DTP Traffic )
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Technology : Catch up on updates on the latest Gadgets, Reviews, Gaming
> and
> Tips to use technology etc.
> http://computing.in.msn.com/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:18 ART