From: Dale Kling (dalek77@gmail.com)
Date: Tue May 27 2008 - 23:57:11 ART
I almost always use map-class frame-relay method. If I need to do MQC crap,
I just nest it in the map-class frame-relay I created. Sometimes you might
run into issues if the MQC is configured to use more bandwidth then the
mincir of the frame-relay map-class. IE You're CIR is set at 256, so by
default your mincir is 128. Your MQC is prioritizing RTP at 200k, you'll
then have to change the mincir under the frame-relay map-class to at least
200 or it will error when you try and apply the MQC to the map-class.
HTH a little,
Dale
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Chris Gray <chris.gray@ozonenetworks.net>
wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> Has anyone found any clear documentation on how and when to use
> Service-policy style MQC With frame relay, When to enable frame relay
> traffic shaping, when not to , when to use a map-class , when not to etc.
>
> Am I right in thinking we are at a cross point in technology between legacy
> and new i.e. legacy being frame relay traffic shaping, priority queuing,
> and
> the modern day equivalents achieved through MQC.
>
> Not sure about others, but I am never sure how to answer a Qos & Frame
> Relay
> question. Whether to use MQC and apply to the interface or whether to use
> MQC and apply through a map-class. Even when I do, when should we enable
> 'frame relay traffic shaping' under the Frame interface?
>
> Anyone provide any sanity on this topic?
>
> Regards
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:18 ART