From: Rich Collins (nilsi2002@gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 23 2008 - 16:40:30 ART
Actually I think that on R4 you would not want to favor OSPF so that R5 gets
full reachability. Try setting "distance 121" under router ospf on R4 and
check R5's rip database.
-Rich
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Luca Hall <lhall@setnine.com> wrote:
>
> R2 has two connections to R4, R2/R4 is running OSPF on one and RIP on the
> other.
>
> R4 gets the same routes from R2 as both OSPF and RIP, will prefer
> the routes from OSPF because of AD 110 then redistribute these to EIGRP.
>
> Since R4 does not have them in the routing table via RIP it does not
> redistribute them to R5, so no full reachability.
>
>
>
> R1 e0/0 is attached to R2 e0/0 running rip
> R2 s0/0 is attached to R4 s0/0 redistributing rip and ospf
> R2 s0/1 is attached to R4 s0/1 running rip
> R4 e0/0 is attached to R6 e0/0 redistributing eigrp and ospf
> R4 e0/1 is attached to R5 e0/0 running rip
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rich Collins <nilsi2002@gmail.com>
> To: seyfert . <seyfert22@googlemail.com>
> Cc: Luca Hall <lhall@setnine.com>, Cisco certification <
> ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Fri, 23 May 2008 09:55:08 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Re: Redistributing Fun
>
> It's also unclear to me. Does R2 only have a connection to R1 and R4 and
> not to R6 or R5? If so then there is no problem since R4 will always show
> R2 as the next hop to get to those R1 RIP originated routes.
>
> -Rich
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:58 PM, seyfert . <seyfert22@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I dont have a clear view about the topology, would u describe it more
> > clearly...
> > whether R4 is attach to R5,R2, and R6..
> > may be..
> > You can use table to create a clear view of topology
> > ex:
> >
> > R1 attached to x,y,z
> > etc...
> >
> > ..
> >
> > tks
> >
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Luca Hall <lhall@setnine.com> wrote:
> >
> > > R2 mutually redistributes RIP<->OSPF
> > > R4 mutually redistributes EIGRP<->OSPF
> > >
> > > [R1]
> > > e0/0 |
> > > R
> > > I
> > > P
> > > | e0/0
> > > s0/0 -[R2]- s0/1
> > > | |
> > > O R
> > > S I
> > > P P
> > > F |
> > > | |
> > > s0/0 \ / s0/1
> > > [R6]-EIGRP--[R4]--RIP--[R5]
> > > e0/0 e0/0 e0/1 e0/0
> > >
> > > R1 is sending 10 routes to R2, R2 then sends them
> > > via RIP, redistributes them into OSPF and sends via OSPF.
> > >
> > > You want full reachability, my solution is set the RIP routes
> > > on R4 learned by R2 to AD 109 (distance exact match)
> > > to keep them in their own domain; then on R2 summarize them via OSPF
> > > so R4 wont set their AD set to 109, the summaries will be
> > > put into R4's routing table then redistributed into EIGRP.
> > >
> > > Is there any other/better ways to do this?
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:18 ART