From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Sun May 18 2008 - 05:39:22 ART
I think as long as you get the result without breaking any rules, you should
be FINE.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:51 PM, RoRo <cisconetman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Based on your scenario, I would have used set community no-export, unless
> your are in a confederation, then I would use set community local-as.
>
> I would match the interface then as you did, and add the route-map to the
> network stement above.
>
>
> On 5/16/08, John <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> > I seem to be getting the results asked for. Is
> >
> > route-map path
> > match int f0/0.1001
> > set community local-as
> >
> > bgp 65145
> > red conn route-map path
> >
> > the same as, when I say the same I mean achieve the same results.
> >
> > route-map path1
> > set community local-as
> >
> > router bgp 65145
> > net 174.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 route-map path1
> >
> >
> >
> > The 174.1.1.0 network is attatched to f0/0.1001. I'm supposed to
> > advertise
> > the 174.1.1.0 network and make sure it's not advertised outside the AS
> > without
> > using ditribute or prefix lists. I seem to have achieved the desired
> > result,
> > but I'm probably missing something. I' using no other route maps
> anywhere
> > on
> > this router. any input welcome
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
-- Narbik Kocharians CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) www.Net-Workbooks.com Sr. Technical Instructor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:17 ART