From: Gregg Malcolm (gregg.malcolm@gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 16 2008 - 16:27:06 ART
Yes and depends. Since the native rip routes should have a longer netmask,
you should not *have* to filter. The summary should show up but the more
specific routes should be preferred. It depends on the scenario but in
general, some sort of filtering/tagging is a good idea.
HTH - Gregg
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 7:45 AM, ccie <ccie@just-horizon.com> wrote:
> One point two way redistribution
>
>
>
> RIP domain===<R1>====OSPF
>
>
>
> Redistribute the RIP routes into the OSPF, them summary them under the OSPF
> using the summary address command
>
> If I redistribute the OSPF under the RIP, will this summary route comes
> back
> to the RIP domain?
>
> i.e. Do I have to implement route filtering to prevent this summary from
> leaking back to the in to the RIP?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Amin
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:16 ART