From: Matt Bentley (mattdbentley@gmail.com)
Date: Sat May 10 2008 - 12:44:31 ART
Hi GS:
I think this is expected behavior, but not exactly sure.
R4-----------------R5
R4 and R5 has an EIGRP adjacency. R5 is redistbributing two interfaces via
"redistribute connected". Connected routes not installed on R4, but show in
EIGRP topology as "FD Inaccessible". My understanding is if the router
advertising EIGRP routes does not have the routes installed as EIGRP routes
in the routing table, then they show up as FD inaccessible on neighbors. I
am correct in thinking that I would HAVE to advertise them via network
statements for them to be installed on R4? Thanks in advance.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:16 ART