Re: QOS

From: adufour@metlife.com
Date: Thu Apr 24 2008 - 10:49:09 ART

• Next message: KS Anpu: "Debug in 6500...."
• Previous message: Athaide, Dwayne: "QOS"
• Maybe in reply to: Athaide, Dwayne: "QOS"
• Next in thread: Paul Cosgrove: "Re: QOS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello Dwayne,

If you mean LLQ's priority command, then I would say that yes that I may
be an option.... but you may want to clarify with the proctor as it has a
built-in policer.

Andre

"Athaide, Dwayne" <DAthaide@eprod.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
04/24/2008 09:37 AM
Please respond to
"Athaide, Dwayne" <DAthaide@eprod.com>

To
groupstudy <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc

Subject
QOS

Is using the priority command a form of rate limiting or policing an
interface? Would using the priority be an option if one is restricted
from using rate limit or policing on an interface. I vaguely remember
this being discussed on groupstudy and would like to clarify.

Thanks

dwayne

Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
http://www.certscience.com/CCIE

• Next message: KS Anpu: "Debug in 6500...."
• Previous message: Athaide, Dwayne: "QOS"
• Maybe in reply to: Athaide, Dwayne: "QOS"
• Next in thread: Paul Cosgrove: "Re: QOS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:52 ART