Re: BGP full mesh

From: John (jgarrison1@austin.rr.com)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2008 - 11:03:18 ART


So is Synchronization a "dead" command? Is that why sync is disabled by
default now?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Brunner" <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
To: "'John'" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 8:34 PM
Subject: RE: BGP full mesh

> You don't want to enable sync if every router is running bgp - period. No
> need.
>
> You can just "peer over" the middle as, and choose points to run ebgp with
> that middle as. IBGP neighbors do not need to be directly connected.
>
> I'm sure others will offer you some confederation solutions to this...
> Others will proffer the local-as menagerie of commands.
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> John
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:18 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: BGP full mesh
>
> If I have 2 groups of routers in the same as but seperated by a transit AS
> is
> full mesh required between the all the routers even though their
> seperated.
> Assume full mesh in between the routers in each group.
>
> Next, do you want to enable synchronization when you have a full mesh in
> an
> AS?
>
>
> Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
> http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
> http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
http://www.certscience.com/CCIE



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:51 ART