From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2008 - 10:37:59 ART
I didn't see the original thread, so I'll just take the question for what
it's saying now...
In real life we do things the easy way, or the stable way, in order to get
good designs. This often leads to "cookie cutter" approaches.
That methodology, while good for basic/stable networks, does not make anyone
an expert at any technology.
Coming up with some of these convoluted designs highlights how technologies
actually work, therefore determining whether or not we are clueful. :)
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Sadiq Yakasai
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 6:23 AM
To: Ronnie Angello
Cc: Chris McGuire; John; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF network
And what wld be the technical gain by such a convoluted setup which doesnt
make any sense as far as a sound setup goes?
Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:51 ART